The absolute value bars on your page are a disguise. Underneath every |x - c| inequality is an interval waiting to be written down. Once you see the pattern, you stop "solving" these problems — you translate them, and the interval appears in one line.
This is the recognition skill: the moment you read |x - c| < r, your pen should already be writing (c - r,\, c + r). No double inequality, no case-split algebra — just the rewrite, because you know what the symbols mean geometrically.
The instant rewrite, in one table
Let r > 0 throughout (negative r is a separate and much easier conversation — more on that below).
| You see | Read it as | Write | Because |
|---|---|---|---|
| \lvert x - c \rvert < r | "distance from c is less than r" | (c - r,\ c + r) | open ball of radius r around c |
| \lvert x - c \rvert \le r | "distance from c is at most r" | [c - r,\ c + r] | closed ball |
| \lvert x - c \rvert > r | "distance from c is more than r" | (-\infty,\ c - r) \cup (c + r,\ \infty) | outside the ball — two open rays |
| \lvert x - c \rvert \ge r | "distance from c is at least r" | (-\infty,\ c - r] \cup [c + r,\ \infty) | outside, endpoints included |
That is the whole skill. The rest of this article is the why (so the table sticks), the two traps that bite most, and a worked example of each kind so you can see the translation happening live.
Why this works — one picture
On the number line, |x - c| is the distance between x and the point c. The inequality sets a budget on that distance.
- \lvert x - c \rvert < r says "stay within r of c." The allowed region is the open segment around c with radius r. That is exactly (c - r,\ c + r).
- \lvert x - c \rvert > r says "get farther than r from c." The allowed region is everything outside that segment — two separate rays, one to the left of c - r and one to the right of c + r.
The < / \le distinction controls the bracket type, exactly as it does for ordinary inequalities: strict means round (open, excluded), non-strict means square (closed, included).
Worked example: less-than
Rewrite |x + 2| < 7 as an interval.
The trick is to read |x + 2| as |x - (-2)| — so the "centre" is c = -2, not +2. The radius is r = 7.
Apply the rule:
Done. No double-inequality bookkeeping, no sign case-splits. One line.
If you want a sanity check: the interval should be centred at c = -2 with radius 7. Midpoint of (-9, 5) is \frac{-9 + 5}{2} = -2. Half-width is \frac{5 - (-9)}{2} = 7. Both match. The rewrite is correct.
Worked example: greater-than
Rewrite |2x - 1| > 5 as a union of intervals.
Here the expression inside is 2x - 1, not x - c. But the pattern still applies — first to the linear expression, then divided out. One clean route is to rewrite 2x - 1 as 2\!\left(x - \tfrac{1}{2}\right) and then use |2 E| = 2|E|:
Now apply the "greater than" rule with c = \tfrac{1}{2} and r = \tfrac{5}{2}: the solution is
Same answer as you would get by case-splitting 2x - 1 < -5 or 2x - 1 > 5, but reached by recognition instead of algebra. Once you have done this rewrite a few times, the intermediate step of factoring out the 2 becomes automatic — your eye sees |2x - 1| > 5 and immediately computes the two endpoints x = -2 and x = 3 from 2x - 1 = \pm 5.
Two traps that punish the rewrite
Trap 1. Negative r. The rule |x - c| < r \Leftrightarrow x \in (c - r, c + r) assumes r > 0. If you see |x - 3| < -4, stop — the left side is always \ge 0, so it can never be less than -4. The solution is the empty set \varnothing. Conversely, |x - 3| > -4 is satisfied by every real number, because any non-negative number is greater than -4; the solution is \mathbb{R} = (-\infty, \infty). These look like exotic edge cases in textbooks and surprisingly often show up on exam papers exactly to catch students who forgot to check the sign of the right-hand side.
Trap 2. The sign of the thing inside the bars. The pattern is |x - c| with a minus. If you read |x + 5| \le 2 and write x \in (5 - 2, 5 + 2) = (3, 7), you have the wrong centre. The correct reading is |x - (-5)| \le 2, giving x \in [-7, -3]. A good habit: always rewrite the inside explicitly as |x - c| before you pull out c. The plus sign in |x + 5| hides a centre at -5, not +5.
When the inside is not x - c — a quick route
If you see |a x + b| < r for some constants a \neq 0 and b, factor a out of the inside:
So |a x + b| < r becomes |x - c| < \tfrac{r}{|a|} with c = -\tfrac{b}{a}. The centre is the root of ax + b = 0 and the radius is \tfrac{r}{|a|}. You can usually spot the centre without writing this out: it is wherever the inside of the bars equals zero.
Example: for |3x - 6| \le 9, the inside is zero at x = 2, so c = 2. The effective radius is 9 / |3| = 3. Answer: [2 - 3,\ 2 + 3] = [-1, 5]. Try it with the long method — you will get the same answer, just several steps later.
Why recognition beats algebra here
Case-splitting |x - c| < r into -r < x - c < r and solving is never wrong — it is just slow. On a JEE paper with a time budget of two minutes per question, the student who reads |x - 4| \le 3 and writes [1, 7] in six seconds is thirty seconds ahead of the student who sets up the double inequality, adds 4 to all three parts, and then writes [1, 7]. Thirty seconds, five questions deep, is more than an extra problem attempted.
Recognition is not a shortcut. It is a reading. You have done the case-split so many times, in your head, that the intermediate steps disappear and the interval is just what the symbols mean. That is the goal.
For a visual anchor — especially if the "ball around c" picture has not clicked yet — play with |x − c| < r as a Ball of Radius r Around c. Once the geometry is in your bones, the rewrite becomes automatic.