In short
Connect a resistor R, an inductor L, and a capacitor C in series across a sinusoidal source v(t) = V_0\sin(\omega t). Because the three elements are in series, the same current i(t) = I_0\sin(\omega t - \phi) flows through all three. The voltage across the resistor is in phase with i; the voltage across the inductor leads i by 90°; the voltage across the capacitor lags i by 90°. Add the three as phasors and the source voltage amplitude satisfies
where X_L = \omega L and X_C = 1/(\omega C) are the reactances.
Resonance happens at the frequency where X_L = X_C, i.e.
At \omega = \omega_0 the inductive and capacitive voltages cancel exactly, the impedance collapses to Z = R, and the current amplitude I_0 = V_0/R is at its maximum. The phase angle \phi is zero — the circuit behaves like a pure resistor.
Quality factor Q = \omega_0 L/R = 1/(\omega_0 RC) measures how sharp the resonance peak is. The bandwidth (the width of the frequency band where the power is at least half its peak) is \Delta\omega = \omega_0/Q. A high Q gives a narrow, selective peak — what you want in an AM radio picking out Akashvani Delhi (819 kHz) from Akashvani Mumbai (1053 kHz) on a crowded band.
Take an old transistor radio in Lucknow. Turn the tuning dial slowly. For most positions you hear noise, hiss, faint overlapping voices — the broadcast band is a crowded soup of signals, all arriving at the antenna at the same instant, all different frequencies. Then at one particular spot on the dial the static gives way to a single clean station: "Yeh Akashvani hai." Nudge the dial a millimetre further and it is gone — hiss again. The radio was doing nothing magical. All it did was pick one frequency out of the chorus and ignore the rest. Behind that dial is an LCR series circuit whose resonant frequency, adjusted by rotating a tiny variable capacitor, matches the carrier frequency of exactly one station.
This chapter is about that circuit. Three elements in a row — a resistor, an inductor, a capacitor — driven by one sinusoidal source. The physics is richer than it looks. Across all three the same current flows, but the voltage across each has its own phase. The net impedance depends on frequency in a non-monotonic way: high at low and high frequencies, minimum at one special frequency. And that minimum — the resonance — is the mechanism behind every tuning circuit, every MRI scanner's RF coil, every spectrum analyser, and every satellite transmitter in ISRO's downlink stack.
The three voltages across R, L, C — recall from the previous chapter
Before stacking the elements in series, remember what each one does on its own when a current i(t) = I_0\sin(\omega t - \phi) flows through it. (The reason for choosing the current as the reference phasor, instead of the source voltage, will become clear in a moment — the current is common to all three series elements.)
Resistor. Ohm's law holds instantaneously:
The voltage across R is in phase with the current; its peak is V_{R,0} = I_0 R.
Inductor. From v_L = L\,di/dt:
Why: derivative of sine is cosine; \cos\theta = \sin(\theta + \pi/2). So v_L leads the current by 90°. Peak: V_{L,0} = I_0\omega L = I_0 X_L with X_L = \omega L.
Capacitor. Charge is q = Cv_C, so current is i = dq/dt = C\,dv_C/dt, and
Why: integral of sine is -\cos/\omega; -\cos\theta = \sin(\theta - \pi/2). So v_C lags the current by 90°. Peak: V_{C,0} = I_0/(\omega C) = I_0 X_C with X_C = 1/\omega C.
So with the current as reference, the three instantaneous voltages are
Three sinusoids of the same frequency but different phases. Adding them as functions of time looks ugly — but adding them as phasors turns the problem into geometry.
Building the impedance — phasor addition
Kirchhoff's voltage law around the series loop gives, at every instant,
Three sinusoids of the same frequency add to another sinusoid of that frequency — the only question is what the amplitude and phase of the sum are. The cleanest way to compute them is to represent each sinusoid as a phasor: an arrow of length equal to the peak value, rotating anti-clockwise at angular frequency \omega. At any instant the actual voltage or current is the vertical projection of the arrow. Because all three rotate together at the same \omega, their relative orientations are fixed, and we can draw a frozen snapshot.
Put the current phasor \vec{I} along the positive x-axis (our reference direction). Then:
- \vec{V_R} of length I_0 R along the x-axis (in phase with current);
- \vec{V_L} of length I_0 X_L along the positive y-axis (leads by 90°);
- \vec{V_C} of length I_0 X_C along the negative y-axis (lags by 90°).
The source voltage phasor \vec{V} = \vec{V_R} + \vec{V_L} + \vec{V_C}. The inductor and capacitor phasors point in opposite directions along y, so they partially cancel, leaving a net reactive component I_0(X_L - X_C) along +y (or -y if X_C > X_L).
Compute the length of \vec{V} from its two perpendicular components — Pythagoras:
Step 1. Components of the source phasor.
Step 2. Magnitude.
Step 3. Define the impedance Z as the peak voltage per peak current.
Why: we want Ohm's law to hold for amplitudes. V_0 = I_0 Z generalises V = IR by replacing the resistance with an impedance that folds in the reactive drop.
Step 4. The phase angle \phi between source voltage and current is the angle of \vec{V} above the x-axis:
Why: \phi is the phase by which the source voltage leads the current. If X_L > X_C (inductive), \phi > 0, current lags voltage. If X_L < X_C (capacitive), \phi < 0, current leads voltage. If X_L = X_C, \phi = 0, they are in phase — this is resonance.
Step 5. Write the time-domain solution.
The current that satisfies Kirchhoff's loop with source v(t) = V_0\sin(\omega t) is
That is the complete steady-state response of a series LCR circuit to a sinusoidal drive.
Impedance vs frequency — the resonance peak
The formula Z(\omega) = \sqrt{R^2 + (\omega L - 1/\omega C)^2} hides a beautiful non-monotonic shape. At very low frequencies \omega \to 0, X_C = 1/\omega C \to \infty and Z \to \infty — the capacitor blocks DC, so no current flows. At very high frequencies \omega \to \infty, X_L = \omega L \to \infty and Z \to \infty — the inductor blocks high-frequency AC. In between, there is one frequency where X_L = X_C exactly, and the two reactances cancel each other:
or equivalently f_0 = 1/(2\pi\sqrt{LC}). At this resonant frequency the impedance collapses to its minimum value Z_\min = R — just the resistor — and the current amplitude I_0 = V_0/R is at its maximum.
Two things to notice about the shape.
-
The peak height is V_0/R, exactly. No matter how large or small L and C are, at \omega_0 the impedance is Z = R, so I_0 = V_0/R. The peak height depends only on R and V_0.
-
The peak width depends on the ratio of R to the reactances at resonance. A circuit with small R has a sharp, narrow peak (the denominator changes quickly as \omega moves off \omega_0). A circuit with large R has a broad peak — the reactive terms dominate only far from resonance.
This sharpness is captured by the quality factor Q.
The quality factor Q — how sharp is sharp?
Define Q at resonance as the ratio of reactance to resistance:
Why: at \omega_0, \omega_0 L = 1/(\omega_0 C) so both give the same number; substituting \omega_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC} into \omega_0 L gives L/\sqrt{LC} = \sqrt{L/C}. The three expressions are identically equal.
A typical AM-radio tank circuit has Q \sim 80–200 (very selective). A loudspeaker crossover network might have Q \sim 0.7 (deliberately broad). An MRI RF coil at 1.5 T and 63.87 MHz has Q \sim 200–400.
The physical meaning of Q
Q tells you two equivalent things:
-
Voltage magnification. At resonance, V_{L,0} = I_0 X_L = (V_0/R)\omega_0 L = Q V_0. And V_{C,0} = Q V_0. The voltages across the inductor and capacitor individually are each Q times larger than the source voltage — but they are 180° out of phase and exactly cancel. So a 6 V source across an L with Q = 100 can put 600 V across the inductor. This is not a violation of Kirchhoff's law; it is the same law working as it should.
-
Energy ratio. Q = 2\pi \times (energy stored) / (energy dissipated per cycle). A high-Q circuit holds most of its energy in the reactive elements and loses only a small fraction to R per cycle — like a low-friction pendulum.
Bandwidth — the width of the resonance peak
Define the bandwidth \Delta\omega as the width of the frequency range over which the power dissipated in R is at least half its peak. Power dissipated is P = I_\text{rms}^2 R, so half-power means I/I_\max = 1/\sqrt{2}, i.e. Z = R\sqrt{2}.
Setting Z^2 = 2R^2 and using Z^2 = R^2 + (X_L - X_C)^2:
Step 1. Take the +R branch (upper half-power frequency \omega_2 > \omega_0).
Why: multiply through by \omega_2/L; use 1/LC = \omega_0^2.
Step 2. Solve the quadratic for \omega_2 using the quadratic formula.
Step 3. Similarly the -R branch gives
Step 4. Subtract.
Why: the two square-root terms are identical and cancel, leaving just R/L. The bandwidth in angular frequency is R/L — independent of the square roots, independent of C.
Step 5. Divide by \omega_0 to get the dimensionless width.
So
High Q means narrow bandwidth means high selectivity. This is the equation that makes radio tuning possible.
Worked examples
Example 1: Tuning into Akashvani Delhi (AM, 819 kHz)
An AM receiver in Delhi has a tank-circuit inductor L = 200\ \mu\text{H}. A variable tuning capacitor C is set to resonate at Akashvani Delhi's carrier frequency f_0 = 819 kHz. The effective series resistance is R = 8.0\ \Omega.
Find (a) the required capacitance C, (b) the quality factor Q, (c) the bandwidth \Delta f, and (d) the peak voltage across the inductor when a 10 mV carrier is picked up at resonance.
Step 1. From f_0 = 1/(2\pi\sqrt{LC}), solve for C.
Why: square both sides of 2\pi f_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC}, rearrange.
Step 2. Plug in numbers.
Why: inside a typical Indian pocket-radio tuning gang, the variable capacitor ranges from about 20 pF to 360 pF — 189 pF sits comfortably in the middle of that range.
Step 3. Quality factor.
Step 4. Bandwidth.
Why: \Delta\omega = \omega_0/Q in angular frequency; divide by 2\pi to get hertz. The All India Radio AM channels are spaced every 9 kHz, and the 6.35 kHz bandwidth here sits within that spacing — the radio passes one channel and attenuates its neighbours.
Step 5. Peak voltage across the inductor at resonance.
At resonance, current amplitude is I_0 = V_0/R = 0.010/8.0 = 1.25 mA. Voltage across the inductor:
Why: V_{L,0} = Q V_0 = 129\times 10 mV = 1.29 V. A 10 mV antenna signal becomes 1.29 V across the inductor — a 129-fold step-up that boosts the tiny picked-up signal into something the next stage can amplify without adding noise. This is why resonant circuits are used in front of every receiver.
Result. C \approx 189 pF; Q \approx 129; \Delta f \approx 6.35 kHz; V_{L,0} \approx 1.29 V.
What this shows. The little variable capacitor in an AM radio is doing precision engineering: one particular setting matches exactly one station, rejects the ones 9 kHz above and below it by a factor of nearly \sqrt{2} on the first adjacent channel, and voltage-amplifies the desired carrier by Q = 129 before any transistor has touched it. All three functions — tuning, selectivity, pre-amplification — happen in the same one-loop LCR circuit.
Example 2: A 230 V, 50 Hz mains circuit with $R, L, C$ in series
A series LCR circuit is connected across the 230 V, 50 Hz Indian mains. The components are R = 100\ \Omega, L = 0.50 H, C = 20\ \mu\text{F}. Find (a) the reactances X_L and X_C, (b) the impedance Z, (c) the RMS current, (d) the phase angle \phi, and (e) the resonant frequency f_0.
Step 1. Reactances at \omega = 2\pi\times 50 = 314.16 rad/s.
Why: X_L and X_C are almost equal — a clue that 50 Hz is close to \omega_0/2\pi for this particular L and C.
Step 2. Impedance.
Why: the reactive term (X_L - X_C) = -2.1\ \Omega is tiny compared to R = 100\ \Omega, so its square adds only 4.41 to the 10000 already there. The impedance is essentially R.
Step 3. RMS current.
Step 4. Phase angle.
Why: negative \phi means the current leads the voltage slightly — the circuit is marginally capacitive because X_C is marginally greater than X_L at 50 Hz.
Step 5. Resonant frequency.
Why: the designer chose L and C so that resonance falls at 50.3 Hz — essentially at the grid frequency. That is the principle of a grid-connected series-LCR filter used in UPS systems and solar inverter output stages.
Result. X_L = 157.1\ \Omega; X_C = 159.2\ \Omega; Z \approx 100\ \Omega; I_\text{rms} \approx 2.30 A; \phi \approx -1.2°; f_0 \approx 50.3 Hz.
What this shows. A circuit tuned near resonance on the mains behaves almost like a pure resistor — V and I nearly in phase, Z close to R. A small mistuning (50 vs 50.3 Hz) produces a tiny but non-zero phase angle. Industrial filters and PF-correction banks at Tata Steel, Jindal, or any large ISRO test facility exploit exactly this near-resonant condition to deliver real power cleanly into the load.
Common confusions
-
"The voltages across L, C, and R must add up to the source voltage numerically." They add up as phasors, not as numbers. In Example 1, V_L = V_C = 1.29 V each, yet the source is only 10 mV — because V_L and V_C point in opposite directions and cancel, and only the small V_R component remains. The sum of magnitudes is not the magnitude of the sum.
-
"Resonance means the current is infinite." Only if R = 0, which no real circuit has. Real inductors have winding resistance; real capacitors have leakage and ESR (equivalent series resistance); real wires have resistance. R is always non-zero, so I_0 = V_0/R is finite at resonance. What resonance guarantees is that I_0 is at its maximum possible value for a given V_0.
-
"A high-Q circuit is always better." It is more selective, but also more fragile. A high-Q MRI RF coil rings for many cycles after the RF pulse ends, which you must account for in the timing of the receive window. A high-Q industrial filter is more sensitive to component drift with temperature — as L and C vary by 1%, the resonant frequency shifts and you may miss the grid harmonic you were trying to reject. Real designs trade selectivity against robustness.
-
"Resonance in an electrical circuit has nothing to do with mechanical resonance." It is literally the same phenomenon. The series LCR is governed by the equation L\,di/dt + Ri + q/C = V_0\sin\omega t, which is mathematically identical to a mass-spring-damper driven by a sinusoidal force. L plays the role of mass (inertia), 1/C plays the role of spring constant, R plays the role of damping. The resonant frequency 1/\sqrt{LC} is the electrical analogue of \sqrt{k/m}. The sharp peak in I(\omega) is the analogue of the sharp peak in the amplitude of a tuning fork driven at its natural frequency.
-
"At resonance, no power is dissipated." Wrong. At resonance, \cos\phi = 1 (voltage and current in phase), so P = V_\text{rms} I_\text{rms}\cos\phi is at its maximum: V_\text{rms}^2/R. The reactive elements store and return energy without dissipation — but R dissipates more at resonance than at any other frequency, because I_\text{rms} is largest there.
-
"X_L and X_C cancel, so the inductor and capacitor become invisible." They cancel in the source voltage loop, but each individually carries huge voltage (V_L = V_C = QV_0). If you break the circuit across the inductor or capacitor alone, you will see Q times the source voltage — which can be dangerous. High-Q industrial resonant circuits need HV-rated components even when the supply is low-voltage.
You have the series LCR, the impedance formula, the resonance condition, and the Q factor. What follows is JEE-Advanced territory: the differential-equation derivation, the complex-impedance formalism, the parallel LCR (anti-resonance), and why resonance is mathematically the same as a damped driven oscillator.
The LCR differential equation
Starting from Kirchhoff's voltage law around the loop, with q the charge on the capacitor and i = dq/dt the loop current:
Substitute i = dq/dt:
This is a second-order linear ODE with a sinusoidal driving term — structurally identical to the damped-driven harmonic oscillator
under the correspondence m \leftrightarrow L, b \leftrightarrow R, k \leftrightarrow 1/C, x \leftrightarrow q, F_0 \leftrightarrow V_0. Every result from the mechanical driven oscillator translates directly. The natural frequency \omega_0 = \sqrt{k/m} = 1/\sqrt{LC}; the damping ratio \zeta = b/(2\sqrt{km}) = R/2\sqrt{C/L} = 1/(2Q).
The steady-state solution is q(t) = Q_0\sin(\omega t - \phi - \pi/2) with Q_0 = V_0/(\omega Z) — differentiating once gives the i(t) = (V_0/Z)\sin(\omega t - \phi) we already found by phasors.
Complex impedance
The phasor method is the polar-form version of a more powerful trick: write voltages and currents as complex exponentials, v(t) = \operatorname{Re}[V_0 e^{j\omega t}]. Then the complex impedances are
In series, complex impedances add (as in a DC circuit):
Magnitude and phase:
The magnitude is the impedance we derived; the argument is the phase angle \phi. The complex formalism reduces all AC circuit problems — no matter how complicated — to the same arithmetic you already know for DC circuits, with the single replacement that resistances become complex impedances.
Parallel LCR — anti-resonance
Put R, L, C in parallel across a sinusoidal source. The admittances (reciprocals of impedances) add:
Resonance occurs when the imaginary part vanishes: \omega C = 1/(\omega L), i.e. the same \omega_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC}. But now |Y| is minimum at \omega_0, so |Z| = 1/|Y| is maximum, and the current from the source is minimum. This is anti-resonance or a rejector circuit — the opposite selectivity. The tuned plate circuit in a valve AM transmitter is parallel-LCR: at the carrier frequency it presents a huge impedance to the plate, forcing all the RF power into the aerial rather than back through the tube.
Inside the parallel LCR tank at \omega_0, a large current sloshes between L and C (the "tank current"), but only a small current flows from the source — because L and C together form a closed loop that the source does not need to feed. Energy oscillates between magnetic (in L) and electric (in C) at \omega_0, and the source only replenishes what R dissipates.
Why f_0 = 1/(2\pi\sqrt{LC}) is a deep fact, not a formula to memorise
The product LC has units of (second)². This is the only combination of L (henries = V·s/A), C (farads = A·s/V), and nothing else that gives a time — and dimensional analysis forces the natural time scale of any LC circuit to be \sqrt{LC}. The 1/(2\pi) factor is the geometric consequence of the solution being a sinusoid whose period is 2\pi times the time-scale. Once you recognise that \sqrt{LC} is the natural unit of time for a circuit with only L and C, the formula is inevitable — not something to memorise.
Applications across the spectrum
| Where | f_0 | Role of the resonance |
|---|---|---|
| AM radio tuner (Akashvani) | 500 kHz – 1.6 MHz | Selects one station from many |
| FM radio tuner | 88 – 108 MHz | Same, narrower channels |
| MRI RF coil at 1.5 T | 63.87 MHz (Larmor, ¹H) | Matches the spin precession frequency for maximum energy transfer |
| MRI at 3 T | 127.74 MHz | Stronger signal because the Boltzmann-split population difference grows with B_0 |
| ISRO S-band telemetry | 2.2 – 2.3 GHz | Narrow-band receiver front-ends |
| GMRT (Pune) low-band | 150 MHz | Radio astronomy receivers tuned to deep-space continuum emission |
| Induction hob (Butterfly Smart) | 20 – 40 kHz | Drives the cooking pan via a resonant inverter at high efficiency |
| Wireless phone charger | 100 – 200 kHz | Resonant coupling between coils for maximum power transfer |
Each application needs its own trade-off between bandwidth (how much signal must get through) and selectivity (how much interference to reject) — and the design knob is Q.
The L_\text{rms} that matters at resonance
In many textbook problems you are asked to find V_L and V_C individually at resonance and notice they equal QV_0. That is correct and instructive. But be aware: V_L and V_C are not in phase with the source. You cannot add their magnitudes to the source voltage; you have to add them as phasors, which gives zero contribution from V_L + V_C in the loop (because they cancel). A high-voltage reading across L alone does not mean the circuit is storing more energy than the source can supply — it means energy is sloshing between L and C, and the oscilloscope across L captures the reactive-storage voltage, not a net energy injection.
Why Q measures stored energy over dissipated energy
At resonance, current amplitude is I_0 = V_0/R. Peak energy stored in the inductor is
Energy dissipated in R over one full period T = 2\pi/\omega_0 is
The ratio:
So Q = 2\pi\times(\text{peak stored energy})/(\text{energy lost per cycle}). A Q = 100 resonator loses 2\pi/100 \approx 6\% of its stored energy per cycle — that is why it rings for about Q/2\pi cycles after the drive stops, a useful rule of thumb.
Where this leads next
- AC Through R, L, and C — the single-element cases on which this chapter is built.
- AC Generation and RMS Values — the sinusoidal source V_0\sin(\omega t) and why RMS values are the ones we quote.
- Power in AC Circuits and Transformers — what \cos\phi really costs industrial users, and how transformers move real power between voltage levels.
- Self-Inductance and Mutual Inductance — where the L in LC comes from at the microscopic level.
- Damped Oscillations — the mechanical analogue: same differential equation, same resonance, same Q.
- Displacement Current and Maxwell's Equations — why a changing voltage across a capacitor produces a magnetic field just as a current does, the key step that makes electromagnetic waves (and radio) possible.