If you have been paying attention in school, you have probably encountered 0^0 in two places that disagree with each other.
- A programming calculator or a scientific calculator types 0^0 and gets back 1.
- A maths teacher or a careful textbook says 0^0 is undefined — "it has no single answer."
Who is wrong? Neither. The two answers come from two different questions, and both questions have valid places in mathematics. The pragmatic rule is: in the ordinary school setting — where 0^0 crops up in a polynomial formula or an exponent law — treat it as 1. In the calculus/analysis setting — where you might be computing a limit of the form 0^0 — treat it as undefined until you do more work. Here is why both are correct.
The quick answer for exam purposes
In an Indian school exam (NCERT, JEE, CBSE, ICSE), the safe working rule is
That is how textbooks evaluate formulas like (1 + x)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{n}{k} x^k at x = 0. At x = 0, the k = 0 term is \binom{n}{0} \cdot x^{0} = 1 \cdot 0^{0}, and the whole sum has to equal 1^n = 1. That forces 0^0 = 1. If you had said "undefined," the formula would have a hole at x = 0, which nobody wants.
Unless a problem is explicitly about limits or discontinuities, use 0^0 = 1 and move on. Most JEE-level questions that make you encounter 0^0 are really testing the binomial theorem or an empty product, and they all work cleanly when you define 0^0 = 1.
So why does the textbook ever say "undefined"?
Because the word "undefined" is about one specific thing that 0^0 doesn't have: a consistent answer when you think of it as a limit. And in calculus and real analysis, limits are the whole point. Let me show you what goes wrong.
Start with the expression x^y, where you can vary both x and y and watch how the value changes as you slide the inputs towards 0. Intuition says there should be some natural answer at x = y = 0. But there isn't — the value depends on how you approach the origin.
Path 1. Slide y to 0 first, then x to 0. At y = 0 with x > 0, the value x^{0} = 1 for every positive x. So as x \to 0^{+}, the limit is 1.
Path 2. Slide x to 0 first, then y to 0. At x = 0 with y > 0, the value 0^{y} = 0 for every positive y. So as y \to 0^{+}, the limit is 0.
Two paths, two different answers. The expression x^y does not converge to a single value as (x, y) \to (0, 0); it depends on the direction. A quantity that has no single limit is called an indeterminate form, and 0^0 is the classical example.
This is the sense in which 0^0 is undefined. Not because it is mysterious or philosophically weird, but because it is an indeterminate form — the kind of expression that l'Hôpital's rule is designed to help you resolve, case by case, depending on which specific functions approach zero.
Why algebra says 1 and calculus says "undefined"
The two are not contradicting. They are answering different questions.
Algebra asks: "What is 0^0 as a single number, if we choose a value that keeps all our formulas working?"
The formulas that need 0^0 to have a value are things like:
- x^0 = 1 for all x — a consequence of the empty product being 1 (multiplying zero things together gives the multiplicative identity).
- The binomial theorem: (x + y)^n = \sum_{k = 0}^{n} \binom{n}{k} x^{k} y^{n-k}, evaluated at x = 0.
- Polynomial evaluation: \sum_k a_k x^k at x = 0, where the k = 0 term is a_0 \cdot x^0 = a_0 \cdot 1 = a_0.
- Combinatorics: 0^0 equals the number of functions from the empty set to the empty set, which is 1.
All four demand 0^0 = 1 to work without special cases. So by convention, in algebraic contexts, 0^0 = 1.
Calculus asks: "If I take the limit of f(x)^{g(x)} as x \to a, and both f(a) = 0 and g(a) = 0, what is the answer?"
The answer is "it depends on f and g." You cannot just plug in — you have to work out the limit properly, often by taking logarithms. Sometimes the answer is 1, sometimes 0, sometimes something else. So 0^0 as a limit form is indeterminate.
Both statements are true. One is a value; the other is a limiting behaviour. They do not contradict because they are about different kinds of thing.
What to do in an exam
- If the question is about the binomial theorem, polynomial evaluation, or combinatorics, use 0^0 = 1. NCERT and JEE textbooks follow this convention.
- If the question explicitly asks for a limit of the form 0^0 (for example, \lim_{x \to 0^{+}} x^x), do not just write 1 — evaluate the limit carefully, usually by rewriting as e^{g(x) \log f(x)} and taking the limit of the exponent.
- If you see 0^0 in a calculator output, remember: the calculator has picked the convention 0^0 = 1 (often for consistency with the binomial-theorem reason above). That is fine for algebra but not for limit problems.
Why you have heard both
The short answer: you heard 0^0 = 1 in algebra class (where it is the correct convention for formulas to keep working) and 0^0 undefined in calculus class (where it refers to a limit form that has no consistent answer). Both teachers were correct in their own contexts, and the two statements do not clash.
The longer answer is that 0^0 is one of a small family of indeterminate forms — the others being \frac{0}{0}, \frac{\infty}{\infty}, 0 \cdot \infty, \infty - \infty, 1^{\infty}, and \infty^0 — that each carry a "value when simply defined" and a "behaviour when taken as a limit." In algebra we care about the value; in calculus we care about the limit. Most school friction about 0^0 is really friction between those two modes of reasoning.
Once you notice the pattern, you will see the same structure everywhere in mathematics. A symbol can carry a definition and a limiting-behaviour story, and the two can look contradictory until you realise they answer different questions.
Related: Exponents and Powers · What Could 0^0 Possibly Be? Two Limit Paths, Two Different Answers · Why a⁰ = 1: The Halving Staircase That Forces the Answer · Why 2^0 = 1 and Not 0